Showing Post From AI
ML experiment tracking in 2026: revisit MLflow, Aim and ClearML before you buy another hosted tracker seat
Many ML and LLM teams still treat a hosted experiment tracker as the adult default. A few notebook charts feel messy, someone pastes a Weights & Biases or Neptune signup link into Slack, and the team buys another seat before anyone asks where the run history, artefacts and model lineage must live.
Read moreLLM guardrails in 2026: revisit NeMo Guardrails, Guardrails AI and LLM Guard before you ship another chatbot without input checks
An internal chatbot can look ready after a few happy-path demos. Then someone pastes a payroll CSV into the prompt, tries a jailbreak that worked on a public model last month, or asks the bot to call a tool with a destructive argument.
Read moreLLM evaluation in 2026: revisit promptfoo, DeepEval and Ragas before you ship another prompt change on gut feel
A prompt change looks harmless in review. One extra sentence in the system prompt, a new model version, a different chunk size in the retriever.
Read moreDocument parsing for RAG in 2026: revisit Docling, Unstructured and Marker before you feed another PDF to your AI pipeline
Most retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) projects start with a quick demo: load a few PDFs, split the text every 1,000 characters, push the chunks into a vector store and ask questions.
Read moreLLM observability in 2026: revisit Langfuse, Arize Phoenix and OpenLIT before you ship another AI feature without traces
Somewhere in your company today, a team is shipping an AI feature that calls a model, maybe a tool, and returns an answer.
Read moreSelf-hosted AI chat front ends in 2026: revisit Open WebUI, LibreChat and AnythingLLM before you paste another internal document into a public chatbot
Somewhere in your company today, a person is pasting a design document, a customer email or a stack trace into a public chatbot.
Read more